1. The Defendant’s KRW 146,529,273 among the Plaintiff and KRW 101,00,000 among the Plaintiff, shall be KRW 45,529,273.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is the party concerned. The Plaintiff is the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 9 Apartment-dong 469 households and ancillary facilities (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

2) Of the nine 469 households, five Dong (302, 303, 304, 308, 309 Dong) 184 households are general buyers, four Dong (301, 305, 306, 307 Dong) 285 households among the nine 469 households.

3) The Defendant is a project proprietor who constructed and sold the instant apartment. B. The instant apartment was inspected on November 26, 2009, and the Defendant’s auxiliary intervenor, a contractor, did not construct the part to be constructed in accordance with the design drawings regarding the instant apartment or constructed it differently from the defective construction or design drawings.

2) Accordingly, the Plaintiff continuously requested the repair of defects to the Defendant and the Intervenor auxiliary to the Defendant at the request of the occupants and the sectional owners from the time of the inspection on the use of the apartment in this case, and the repair work was implemented for some defects. However, the apartment in this case still has the same defects as the defect in the item 1. Attached Table 1. In order to repair the apartment in this case, the Plaintiff still takes the same amount of expenses as the following table on the premise that “part Dok” is “part Dok” after repairing the heat of the outer wall (the result is

(a) (Unit: 15,081, 159, 706, 706, 876, 221, 47, 475, 175, 177, 5712, 513, 639, 64, 622, 453, 178, 775, 7740, 167, 127, 69222, 656, 379, 375, 168, 197, 197, 1964, 197, 197, 157, 1964, 197, 1965, 127, 267, 379, 370, 370, 370, 897, 4195, 1965, 197, 1964, 197

(c) substituted for defect repairs;