1. The defendant (attached Form 1) Nos. 1 through 13, 15, 17 through 37, 39 through 57, 156 through 184, and 187 among the plaintiffs' list.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. At the time of November 16, 2013, the Plaintiffs were living in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government A apartment (hereinafter “instant apartment”) or owned the said apartment household.

Detailed details of households residing or owned by the plaintiffs are as shown in attached Form 2.

(In the first lawsuit, there was a vacancy between 175 and 177 as three of the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the withdrawal of the lawsuit. The plaintiffs' sequences (attached Form 1) b.

On November 16, 2013, S76C/H9294, which the Defendant owned and operated, (hereinafter “instant helicopters”) was crashed and disseminated after the collision on the north side of the instant apartment building 102-dong (SB; hereinafter “102-dong”) and 11-dong and 101-dong (SPC; hereinafter “101-dong”) from the above apartment 102-dong to the 28-dong and 28-dong (SP; hereinafter “101-dong”) were directly damaged by the household on November 16, 2013, which was operated for the purpose of enabling the Defendant’s officers and employees to board on the ground due to the weather condition that is not recognizable due to the opening.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap's entry (including each number, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), the whole purport of pleading, and the whole purport of pleading

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to the facts of recognition of tort liability, the defendant, as the owner and operator of the helicopter of this case, should restrict operation and prevent accidents under the weather conditions in which it is difficult to operate the helicopter, but the restricted zone caused the accident by negligence of unreasonably taking into consideration the board convenience of officers and employees in a situation where it is impossible to identify the ground on the inside. Thus, the defendant is obliged to compensate for damages caused by mental distress suffered by the victims in the course of the accident of this case and recovery from damage.

Meanwhile, the Plaintiffs are subject to the instant accident.