A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 00:40 on April 26, 2019, the Defendant: (a) expressed a large voice that “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am

2. The Defendant committed assault, at the same time, at the same time and place as the above Paragraph (1) above, the Defendant committed assault, such as: (a) the Defendant was trying to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender; (b) the Defendant was able to walk the instant E’s rewing on one occasion due to a defect in arresting the Defendant as a flagrant offender.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning E's handling of reported cases and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Complaint (E);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes (F, E);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of punishment, Articles 311 (Contempt) and 136 (1) (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties) of the Criminal Act, and imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Grounds for aggravated punishment of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act: Confession, necessity of assistance for principal offenders, absence of records of punishment heavier than imprisonment without prison labor, etc.;