logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.08.27 2014구합68553
수용보상금증액 청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 1,521,680; (b) KRW 19,051,086 to Plaintiff A; and (c) from December 28, 2013 to August 27, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Approval and Public Notice of Projects - Housing Redevelopment rearrangement Project in Zone C (hereinafter “instant Project”) - Public Notification D of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on October 15, 2007 - Project implementer: Defendant

B. The Seoul Metropolitan City Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on November 8, 2013 (hereinafter “instant ruling of expropriation”): The expropriation object: The Seoul Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E-106 square meters and its obstacles, the Seoul Seongdong-gu F-195.42 square meters and their obstacles (hereinafter “each land”) owned by the Plaintiff, refers to the lot number alone, and the total of the above land “each land of this case” and the total of the above land and obstacles are collectively referred to as “each land of this case,” and the date of expropriation: The expropriation date: the appraisal corporation Leesan and Alban appraisal corporation (hereinafter “Expropriation”) on December 27, 2013: the sum of obstacles to the Plaintiff’s land A760,020,000 won, KRW 107,426, KRW 190, KRW 867, KRW 190, KRW 190, KRW 1639, KRW 406, KRW 86,086,2788

(2) The plaintiff's request for the payment of additional charges for delay shall be dismissed).

The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection (hereinafter “the instant ruling”) on August 21, 2014 - One appraisal corporation and one appraisal corporation (hereinafter “appraisal on an objection”)’s land obstacles A764,737,00 won (Dismissal of an objection) B 1,66,937,860 won (Dismissal of an objection) - The amount of compensation for each land of this case shall be increased as indicated below, and an objection against the charges for filing an objection and additional charges for delaying an application for adjudication against each obstacles shall be dismissed.

1) Each of the instant lands is located in the vicinity of subway 2 G Station, and falls under Class 3 general residential areas, and all traffic conditions are good. E land was used in an irregular and primary manner adjacent to a triangulation, and F land was used for commercial purposes in a rectangular form. 2) An appraiser H who is entrusted with appraisal by this Court.

arrow