1. The Defendant’s KRW 22,416,072 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from August 24, 2010 to October 28, 2014.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. (1) On August 24, 2010, the Plaintiff joined the Defendant Company C (hereinafter “Defendant Company”).

(2) On August 24, 2010, the day when the Plaintiff became a member of the company, on August 24, 2010, the Plaintiff was involved in an accident of falling off to the floor with the steel board as a result of the Defendant’s improper manipulation, while being engaged in the melting work on the iron plate, which was 1.5m high above the ground.

(3) On September 1, 2010, the Plaintiff, on September 1, 2010, reduced the product height of stairs from the point of view of the instant accident and the same month 24, and September 1, 2010, received Hanwon’s Hanwon’s one-way bedclothes treatment with the right bed, etc. (hereinafter “instant accident”). In addition, around September 1, 2010, the Plaintiff shot the second shock of trees.

(4) As a result, the Plaintiff suffered from injury to the right part of the knife, etc., and received the knife knife knife knife on December 22, 2010.

(5) From the date of the instant accident to May 31, 201, the Plaintiff received medical care benefits of KRW 6,233,220, temporary disability compensation benefits, KRW 16,740,360 from the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service during the period of the instant medical care until May 31, 201, and received KRW 4,818,00 as disability benefits after the period of the said

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 4, and 8, witness D's partial testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the accident of this case occurred when the defendant operated the cater directly and loaded the cateral with the wind to manipulate the cateral wrongs while entering the cateral. Thus, the plaintiff is liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case.

(c)the limitation of liability has been examined by the defendant, while carrying out his own safety and work on his own, and without notifying the defendant company of his status accurately after the accident, continued to engage in work, and concrete work;