logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.04.03 2013고단3606
절도등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant was accommodated as a thief customer in the Eelbur 508 managed by the victim D in Gwangju Mine-gu. A.

On July 4, 2013, at around 18:00, the Defendant stolen the said Eel with a computer part of 2.70,000 won at the market price owned by the said victim.

B. The Defendant around 11:00 on July 8, 2013, around 11:00

In the above manner, the victim’s market price was 190,000 won or more, and the victim’s body was stolen.

C. On July 9, 2013, the Defendant around 11:00 and around 1-A.

At the place described in the subsection, the victim was stolen with one computer monitor with a total of KRW 70,00,000 at the market price of the above victim.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the above victim's property.

2. Fraud;

A. On July 4, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 19:00, operated by the Victim FF, at the fifth floor H of the Seo-gu G building in Gwangju, Seo-gu, Seoul, which was operated by the Victim F, KRW 1

As stated in paragraph (1), false statement was made that a stolen computer part was one’s own, and that part was delivered 270,000 won from the victim’s seat to the sales price of the computer parts.

B. On July 8, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 11:10 on July 8, 2013, to the Victim K who had worked at the J located in Gwangju Mine-gu I.

As stated in paragraph (1), 190,000 won was delivered from the above victim as the sales proceeds of the main body of the computer at the seat of the victim.

C. On July 9, 2013, the Defendant operated the Victim L around 11:10 on July 9, 2013.

The victim shall be subject to paragraph 1(c) at the place stated in the paragraph.

As stated in paragraph (1), a stolen computer monitor was issued KRW 70,00 from the victim's seat to the sales proceeds of the computer monitor.

Accordingly, the defendant was provided property by deceiving the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning L;

1. D. D.

arrow