1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eighteen years and six months;

2. However, the execution of imprisonment for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 3189]

1. A special intimidation Defendant: (a) around 14:50 on August 23, 2015, at the victim’s house located in the D apartment 101 Dong 1202, Seoul, Nowon-gu, Seoul, the Seoul Northern District Court issued an order to prohibit access to the victim, but requested the victim to open the gate, and requested the victim to open the gate, which is a dangerous object that would not cause as soon as possible, and (b) opened the door so far by using the hacks (a sloping beam, about 50cm in length) and then cut off the door so far as possible, “I will open the door. If you do not open the door, I will die the door from the incidental window.”

[2015 Highest 3257]

2. Destruction and damage of special property;

A. At around 08:30 on July 29, 2015, the Defendant, who is his spouse, found a restaurant of “F” operated by the victim under subparagraph 111 of the building E-gu Seoul Southern-gu, Gangnam-gu, Seoul and damaged the entrance door of a restaurant equivalent to KRW 200,000 at the market price owned by the victim.

B. At around 22:00 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) destroyed and damaged the windows of flaging vehicles with a view to 80,000 won at a parking lot located on the second floor of the building E under the preceding paragraph, which is a dangerous object located around the place for the same reason as the preceding paragraph; and (b) caused damage to the windows of flaging vehicles owned by the victim C

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous things and destroyed the property owned by the victim.

3. On August 2, 2015, around 20:40 on August 2, 2015, the Defendant of special intimidation: (a) at the “F” restaurant as indicated in paragraph 2(a) of Article 2; and (b) on the part of the victim C, on the ground that the victim did not have known it to the victim, the Defendant sought a restaurant again on the ground that the victim did not have known it, and (c) called “F”, on the ground that he did not enter it.