1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the decision on retrial;

A. An intervenor is a corporation established by the Korea Railroad Corporation and employs approximately 28,00 full-time workers and has established 12 regional headquarters, such as Seoul Headquarters, as a corporation engaged in railroad passenger business and cargo transportation business.

On April 19, 2004, the Plaintiff entered into an employment contract with the Intervenor, and worked in the Seoul Headquarters Search Station, ridged Station, etc., and was in charge of the handling of lost property in the Seoul Western Headquarters B from October 23, 2015.

B. At around January 3, 2016, C, a national of the Philippines, placed a bank containing USD 2,500, KRW 275,000, and KRW 1 certificate of alien registration, etc. (hereinafter “instant lost property”) in the train line 1 line in the metropolitan electric power station in the Seoul metropolitan area, around 13:39.

C Recognizing this late, C recognized it and reported its loss to the Service Center of the Bhutan calendar.

C. After confirming the fact that the said train did not pass through the B Station, the B Station requested the Plaintiff to collect the lost goods of this case from the Plaintiff who was in charge of the management of lost goods in the B Station.

The Plaintiff directed the social work personnel D to collect the lost property of this case, and D collected and delivered the lost property of this case to the Plaintiff. However, the Plaintiff filed a false report with the head of Songan Station that he did not discover the lost property of this case, and brought the lost property of this case to his house.

On January 4, 2016, the Special Police Officers of the Seoul Local Railroad Police Team asked the Plaintiff about whether the Plaintiff acquired the loss of the instant case.

The Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the loss of the instant case was brought to the Plaintiff’s house, but the Plaintiff did not contain USD 2,500 in U.S. dollars and KRW 275,000 in the lost property of this case.

The plaintiff in the same month.

5. Only after the interview with the B Station, the Plaintiff led to the 2,500 US dollars and 275,000 Won in the lost property of this case.

E. The plaintiff.