logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.06.17 2014가합11218
물품대금 등
Text

1. The defendant is about USD 411,069.87 in US dollars and USD 368,551.84 in US dollars among them to the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a legal entity that mainly engages in the design, design, and manufacture of, and manufacturing process pipes and special pipes such as, the pipe pipes, tank, container, ballast, pumps, and other devices, and the Defendant is a legal entity that mainly engages in the business of exporting and importing piping systems and devices.

B. On April 201, the Plaintiff entered into a three purchase contract with the Defendant for piping temperature facilities (hereinafter “instant contract”) as follows, and delivered all the goods to the Defendant according to the schedule of the instant contract.

On April 26, 2010, MBC-10426 -00 US dollars 29,071 21 April 21, 2010, MBC-10421 -3, 201, MBC-10404-01 US$3,03,648 $3,149,655 on April 4, 2011

C. On March 6, 2012, the Defendant agreed to pay only USD 2,440,324.8, which is a part of the above goods price, to the Plaintiff in five equal installments as follows: USD 709,340.2, US dollars ($ 3,149,665 - USD 2,440,324.8), additional work cost, and technical support cost.

(Interest in Arrears shall be 10% per annum, and the cost of technical assistance shall be changed to the amount actually incurred. ($ 235,000 for the total principal due from the sequence 15, 2012 for the cost of providing technical assistance. ($ 235,000 for the cost of providing technical assistance, USD 210,000 for the cost of providing additional services, and USD 19,370 for April 15, 2012, USD 19,370 for USD 19,370 for USD 19,370 for USD 370 for 216,370 for April 30, 2012, USD 210,000 for USD 216,54, USD 148.54, USD 210,210,210,$ 210,000 for 230,410,02,410 for 36.19,206.

D. The Defendant, in accordance with the above agreement, shall give the Plaintiff 2012

3. 15. U.S. dollars 235,00, and USD 216,148.54, respectively, on April 30, 2012, the Plaintiff paid each such USD 1 and 3.

arrow