logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.02.19 2013고합160
살인등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for ten years.

A seized kacker (No. 1) shall be confiscated.

In this case.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant and the person to whom the attachment order was requested (hereinafter referred to as the "defendants") had weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to the "unsworn personality disorder".

1. homicide;

A. A. Around May 12, 2013, the Defendant and the victim met the victim C (the age of 21) at the Open High School (the age of 21) first met at the Open High School and met, and was living together at the Maurter in Ulsan Nam-gu, and was living together with the victim on a year-based basis, and the victim was able to feel suspicion that he and the victim had continued to talk with the other male even after his and her rights and duties.

B. On May 2013, the Defendant and the victim met with the victim’s direct witness to check the victim’s contact with another male and confirmed that the victim had come to contact with the other male, and demanded the victim to not contact with the other male.

On June 2013, 2013, there is no contact with the defendant at the motherel living together with the victim.

The victim who entered the new wall 4:00 p.m. went to another male and club.

As a result of hearing the fact that there has been a lot of dispute with the victim, it has again started with the victim.

The Defendant, while engaging in a dispute with the victim, was in violation of the Defendant’s arm’s length for the reason that the victim would have hedginged, and was invested in the Taecheon River Modern located in the Modern area, thereby leading the Defendant to commit suicide, thereby getting the patient to receive medical treatment.

After the above case, the hospital where the defendant was hospitalized had the victim found and had a re-eded with the victim living together, had maintained a relationship with him/her, but the victim opened a password on his/her mobile phone from June 2013 to did not show the details of the mobile phone text messages and the details of the receipt.

Accordingly, the defendant.

arrow