1. The Defendant: (a) from March 12, 2010 to Plaintiff A with respect to KRW 1,000,000 for each of the said money and each of the said money.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 12, 2010, Plaintiff A had his/her parents with Plaintiff B and C, and on March 12, 2010, the Defendant was employed and worked together with D at the construction site of 728 Building (hereinafter “instant construction site”). On March 13, 2010 and March 14, 2010, Plaintiff A worked for four workers, including D, at the instant construction site. On March 15, 2010, the instant construction site was on the day of the instant construction site, and on March 16, 2010 and March 17, 2010, Plaintiff A worked for the instant construction site, but was provided medical treatment at each hospital.

B. In relation to treatment, Plaintiff A received medical treatment under the name of “A, (1) on March 16, 2010, and on March 17, 2010, under the name of F Council member in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Seoul-gu, “A disability of base and tension of the bones, and of detailed unknown congrative signboards.”

(2) On March 16, 2010, the medical treatment was provided even to G GJ beyond the fixed range.

(3) From March 25, 2010 to April 21, 2010, I had been hospitalized in the name of “Yacheon-gu, Yacheon-gu, Ya-gu, Daejeon, under the name of “Yacheon-gu, Yacheon-gu, and the right-hand section,” and received outpatient treatment from April 22, 2010 to August 11, 2010.

(4) From Jun. 9, 2010 to Jun. 28, 2010, the J Council received medical treatment under the name of “Neth Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Est

C. On April 1, 2010, Plaintiff A filed an application for medical care benefits with the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service (hereinafter “Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service”), and the Defendant rejected the said application’s seal.

(2) The Korea Labor Welfare Corporation has conducted a disaster investigation on the Plaintiff A’s application for medical care benefits, and the said investigator is a person suffering from an accident.