The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because it is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. There are no circumstances that may be considered favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case, and that the defendant's profit derived from each of the crimes of this case is relatively minor.

However, there is a high possibility of criticism because the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crimes without being subject to criminal punishment several times of punishment, and the defendant has committed repeated crimes within a short time after the punishment has been sentenced several times, and there is a good condition to open the defendant.

In light of the fact that it is difficult to see that the damage caused by each of the instant crimes has not been recovered at all, and other various sentencing conditions shown in the records and theories of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is too unreasonable, and thus, the above assertion by the Defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.