logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2014.10.21 2014가단8141
공탁금출급청구권확인
Text

1. Thai Construction Co., Ltd., on October 26, 2010, deposited by the Seoul Eastern District Court No. 3799, the amount of KRW 75,900,453.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Tae Young-gu Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “ST”) awarded a contract to the Defendant STT Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant STT”) for “TT Construction,” and “TTT Construction,” for “Construcing ethyl City TK Twitle ethyl City, Constru roof and home pipeline construction, and the roof board construction, etc. of the T-Seban Complex Complex Construction,” until October 26, 2010, the Nonparty Company did not pay 75,900,453 (hereinafter “the remainder of this case”).

B. On September 1, 2010, Defendant Stiti transferred to the Nonparty Company “200 million won of the purchase price claim” to the Nonparty Company, and transferred “200 million won of the purchase price claim to the Defendant Company (hereinafter “Defendant Round”) to the Nonparty Company as indicated below.”

The Defendant-based transferee 200 million won Certification as of September 2, 2010, which was 1,000,000 won as of September 2, 2010, as of September 3, 2010, as the date of arrival of the notification method of the transfer of the position of the Defendant-based 1,00,000 won, (i) 7,4260,00 won Certification as of September 4, 2010; (ii) 43,075,316 won Certification as of September 5, 2010; (iii) 11,751,000 won Certification as of September 10, 2010; (iv) 7,000 won Certification as of September 10, 2010; and (v) 7, 2010,000 won Certification as of September 4, 2010; and (v) 3, 2010,00 won.

On September 2, 2010, Defendant J requested the non-party company to pay the subcontract price of KRW 1,004,000 to Defendant Sastra, but did not meet the requirements for the direct payment of the subcontract price.

arrow