A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On May 13, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on May 21, 2016 by the Ulsan District Court for a violation of the Trademark Act, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 21, 2016.

【Criminal Facts】

No one shall deliver, sell, forge, forge, or possess a trademark identical with or similar to another person's registered trademark for the purpose of using or making another person use such trademark on goods identical with or similar to the designated goods.

1. On July 201, 201, the Defendant, who was engaged in the packing paper manufacturing business, forged the packaging paper of the “proving old spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn” with the registered trademark of the Defendant, and sold it directly by making it possible for the Defendant to sell it. On July 201, 201, the plastic packaging paper of “the old spawn spawn spah” with the registered trademark of the Defendant on the spawn swn

Accordingly, the above B requested C to build 12,000 plastic packaging paper for the above plastic packaging paper in Busan Jung-gu, Busan, by requesting C to build 12,000 plastic packaging paper for the "Saeong Pedle Pedle Pedle Pedle Pedle Pedle Pedle Pedle Pedle Pedle Pedle Pedle Pedle", and issued 12,000 g of the "Sale Pedle Pedle Pedle" packaging paper with the trademark of the same shape as the registered trademark of the above C as the registered trademark of the company, but it appears that the “Kg” was a clerical error in the indictment.

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with the above B, forged the trademark of “the old screen” for the purpose of using the trademark identical to the registered trademark of another person for goods identical with or similar to the designated goods.

2. On August 2012, 2012, the Defendant committed the Defendant on the Habman’s August 2012, 201, on which the instant C, along with the foregoing B, indicated the registered trademark of “An old spawn spath,” as stated in the foregoing paragraph 1, was affixed to the YE event site near the YE.