Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the father and doctor of the “D Hospital” in Busan Dongdong-gu C.

Around 11:00 on October 21, 201, the Defendant: (a) instructed the nurse F in charge of administering metothotothototho to administer metothotothothothothothothothothothothothothothothothothothothothothothothothothothothothothothothothy,

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness G, H, I, and F;

1. Records of proceedings;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of each statute of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 88 and 22 (3) of the Medical Service Act for the Selection of Punishment, and Selection of Fines;

1. The portion not guilty under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which is attracting a workhouse;

1. On October 21, 201, the Defendant, who is a summary of the primary facts charged, ordered the nurseF in charge to administer the penttootootoo in order to proceed only with the inducement of mother E at the delivery room of D Hospital 708 located in the Busan East-gu, Busan at around 11:0 on October 21, 201, the Defendant did not enter such fact in the medical instruction record, even though he ordered the nurseF to administer the penttootoo to do so

2. The Defendant stated to the effect that the Defendant instructed the nurse F in charge of administering the Rotototoo, recorded this in the medical instruction record, and later stated to the effect that the part of the statement was deleted after receiving a report from F that the Rotototoo was not administered later, and that the witness F also stated to the same effect. In light of the foregoing, the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor alone was insufficient to prove that the Defendant did not enter the direction of the Rotototototoo in the instruction record of the mototoo, so it was different from the facts.

It is difficult to see it.

3. Conclusion, the primary facts charged in the instant case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, not guilty should be pronounced pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, but the instant preliminary charges.