Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a driver of Crench D rocketing car owned by Crench.

On 04:50 on 18, 2014.18. 04:50, the Defendant continued the private street crossing in front of the two-lanes located in the north-gu, Gwangju, North-gu, about 50km in the direction of the free stadium from the two-lanes on the side of the four-lane streets in the two-lane market.

In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle has the duty of care to confirm whether there is a motor vehicle traveling along the intersection by reducing speed and checking the side well, and to prevent accidents by driving safely according to the traffic signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and continues to proceed at the same speed by violating the signal, even though the signal is a stop signal.

From the right side of the proceeding to the left side of the passenger car operated by the victim E (50 years old) who is driving by the crossing in accordance with the new code, the left side of the passenger car for the F-business purpose conflicts with the front part of the passenger car operated by the defendant.

As a result, the defendant caused by negligence in the course of performing his duties the injury of the victim, such as salt, tension, etc., which requires two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A report on investigation (damage-free taxi stackers reading);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the medical certificate (E);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is recognized that the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order include: (a) the fact that the defendant's mistake appears to have been repented and reflected; (b) the degree of injury to the victim is not limited; and (c) the defendant's vehicle was covered by a comprehensive insurance policy.

However, on the other hand, the defendant caused the traffic accident of this case by gross negligence, i.e., violation of signal, and other similar cases.