A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 21, 2017, around 10:0, the Defendant assaulted D’s item by hand on the ground that D’s basic living cost is reduced or reduced within the 1st floor of the C Administrative Welfare Center, which is a public official in charge of social welfare affairs of the above welfare center, while counseling with D, who is in charge of social welfare affairs of the above welfare center, on the ground that D’s basic living cost is cut, and later, D’s item is cut off by left hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the social welfare of public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Public official certificates;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order is not good, considering the fact that it is against the law, that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, and that the health is not good.