1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The plaintiff's addition to this court against the defendant B.

1. The grounds for this part of the underlying facts are as follows, except for those written by the court as follows, and thus, the relevant part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is identical to that of the corresponding part. Thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

The grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows. The 4th 15th 17th 17th son are as follows.

H. On September 5, 2014, according to the instant agreement, the Plaintiff submitted a written withdrawal of the report of the right of retention stating that “to waive the right of retention” in the instant auction procedure. On September 6, 2014, the Plaintiff handed over the instant franchise to the Defendants on September 6, 2014, and transferred 30 guest rooms entrance doors. On the same day, F asked the Defendants to succeed to the contract by telephone at the closure. On September 7, 2014, Defendant C demanded to change the contact number to the mobile phone number of Defendant C’s mobile phone number at the time of the accident by telephone at the closure. On September 23, 2014, the Plaintiff succeeded to the license to use the method service contract with the closure.” On September 23, 2014, the Plaintiff added 5 pages of “A evidence 37, B evidence 37, B evidence 75, E evidence 76-1 through 76-4, and 76-4, respectively.”

2. The reasoning for this part of the judgment regarding the primary claim is as follows, except where the court makes an application for the reasons for this part of this judgment or adds the judgment on the allegations that the plaintiff newly raised in this court, and therefore, it is identical to the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article

5 The 9 line shall be considered as "2. The primary argument and judgment".

6) The part of the 6th nine and ten lines “the fact that the instant cartel was delivered to the Defendants on September 23, 2014, succeeded to the agreement to use the crime prevention service with the closures, and the key was transferred to the Defendant on September 6, 2014,” which read “the fact that the instant cartel was delivered to the Defendant on September 6, 2014, and the keys was transferred to the Defendant, and that the two succeeded to the agreement to use the crime prevention service with the closures on September 23, 2014.”

Above 6 up to 7 lines "each entry of evidence Nos. 44, Eul No. 26 through 29, 36, 42".