logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.06.28 2018누41282
퇴학처분취소청구의 소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the reasoning of the judgment, is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following addition or dismissal, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

"A evidence Nos. 4 through 10" of 5 pages 11 of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance shall be added to "B Nos. 3 through 12."

The following shall be added to the 6th 11 line of reasoning in the judgment of the first instance.

In particular, in the door and answer of the 2nd university life guidance professor, the Plaintiff recognized the instant violation without any special vindication, and took the attitude of reflecting it. Of the reasons in the first instance judgment, the part between 6 and 4, and 7, among the reasons in the first instance judgment is as follows.

•The Plaintiff was trying to keep the motive, life and body, etc. through which the Plaintiff was extremely strong, and the Plaintiff was in the process of completing the college course in a normal manner without any particular problem, while being subject to disciplinary action or criminal punishment before the instant disposition.

2. Conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow