1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 29, 2012, the Plaintiff, while engaging in the manufacturing business of the first-string machine under the trade name of “C”, discontinued its business.

D In September 29, 201, when conducting manufacturing business of automation machinery and motor vehicle parts with the trade name of "E", the defendant was established by investing the business in E on September 29, 201.

B. The Plaintiff entered into a goods supply contract with D on November 12, 2008, and continued the transaction for several years from February 2009, including “the first-frequency melting of automobile parts” and “the first-frequency melting of automobile parts.”

C. On March 6, 2014, the Plaintiff supplied parts of a motor vehicle to D and not paid for the same year from May 14, 2012

8. 23. A lawsuit was brought to seek payment of KRW 3,8140,000,000,000 unilaterally cancelled price after the order was placed until 23.

On September 29, 2011, the Western District Court of Daegu District established the defendant by investing in the business of E, which was a personal business entity, and since the trade name of E and the defendant are the same as the main part of social norms, the defendant is liable to pay the debt by analogical application of Article 42(1) of the Commercial Act. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against D, who is an investor, with the lapse of two years of exclusion period stipulated under Article 45 of the Commercial Act, and thus, the plaintiff's lawsuit was dismissed by deeming that it is unlawful.

(2014 group3530). e.

After filing an appeal, the Plaintiff withdrawn the appeal on September 8, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive as it is.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's 1 through 7 evidence, Gap's 15 evidence (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff supplied various automobile parts, including mixtures, by April 2008 upon request of D for the manufacture of automobile parts. The Plaintiff supplied various automobile parts by May 30, 2012. The Plaintiff did not receive KRW 20 million out of the price.

The defendant is the human and physical resources of D private chain E.