1. As to KRW 110,983,852 among the Plaintiff and KRW 37,100,00 among them, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 73,883,852 from May 3, 2017.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a company that manufactures automobile parts, etc. under the trade name of “C,” and the Defendant is a company that aims at manufacturing automobile parts, etc.

B. Around July 15, 2016, the Plaintiff submitted a written estimate to the Defendant that the Plaintiff could produce D gold punishment (i.e., KRW 29,095,791 (= KRW 19,800,105 KRW 9,259,686).

The report on completion of the issuance of the tax invoice after completion of the examination of the defective performance bond of KRW 37,100,000 after the completion of the examination of the completion of the last month after the completion of the examination of the defective performance bond of KRW 37,100,00 of the contract for the contract for the performance guarantee of KRW 15,90,000 for the time required for the separate amount of payment (30%)

C. On August 9, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant to manufacture and supply E-mail (hereinafter “E-mail”) for KRW 53,000,000, and the method and conditions for payment are as follows.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2 and 7 (including branch numbers, hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion 1) Although the Plaintiff received a request from the Defendant for the manufacture of the instant gold paper Nos. 1, 2 and completed the manufacture, the Plaintiff did not receive KRW 29,090,000 for the remainder of the gold paper No. 1 and KRW 37,100,000 for the instant gold paper No. 2, and thus, sought payment of the said money to the Defendant. 2) The Plaintiff used the instant gold paper No. 2 to manufacture and supply 500,000 automobile parts to the Defendant, and the Defendant unilaterally suspended the manufacture of the automobile parts and did not implement the consignment agreement on October 2016, and thus, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages incurred by the Plaintiff.

The amount of damages that the Defendant is liable to compensate shall be the Plaintiff for the production of components in the difference between the facility purchase price and the sale price of KRW 51,700,000.