The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (2.5 million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is against the depth of the crime of this case and does not repeat the crime, and there is no way to impose any specific criminal punishment other than once a fine.

The defendant's vehicle is covered by a comprehensive insurance and the defendant's economic situation is also recognized.

However, the crime of this case is not easy to say that the defendant's negligence in the course of driving a vehicle, and caused injury to the victim, such as the alley that requires about five weeks of treatment, by shocking the victim who scams the crosswalk due to occupational negligence.

Until the trial, agreement with the victim was not reached.

In addition, considering the various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, such as the age, character and conduct, environment, economic situation, etc. of the defendant, the sentence of the court below cannot be deemed to be unfair because it is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.