The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that of the lower court’s punishment of KRW 2.5 million (a fine of KRW 2.5 million) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below stated that the defendant did not repeat the crime of this case in depth, and that the defendant did not have any criminal record prior to the crime of this case.

The occurrence of the instant accident seems to have contributed not only to the defendant's negligence, but also to the negligence of violating the signal given by the victim, and all victims are not punished by the defendant.

The defendant's vehicle is covered by a comprehensive insurance and the defendant's economic situation is also recognized.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant while driving a vehicle, and caused many victims to suffer human damage due to the negligence of the central line by occupational negligence, and the victim C does not suffer from an injury, such as the left-hand chest, which requires approximately seven weeks of treatment.

Examining the background of the instant accident, the details of the Defendant’s occupational negligence, the degree of injury suffered by the victims, and other various sentencing conditions indicated in the records and pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, economic circumstances, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed to be too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.