The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the original court (one year of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection) shall be too unlimited and unfair; and

2. Although the Defendant appears to be against the Defendant’s recognition of the instant crime, and there are favorable conditions in cooperation with the investigation of the upper line, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the lower court against the Defendant is too unreasonable in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the commission of the instant crime, given that the instant crime was committed not only by the simple administration of the philopon, but also by the purchase and sale of the philopon.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.