logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.12.14 2017구합61980
파면처분취소결정 취소의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the costs incurred by participation.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a school foundation that establishes and operates C University. The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) was appointed as a full-time lecturer at the above University on May 1, 1994, and was promoted as an assistant professor on April 1, 199, and was employed as a teacher belonging to the Ministry of Culture and Tourism.

1. On February 11, 2015, the President of the Korea Communications Commission and the President of the Korea Communications Commission (the grounds for disciplinary action No. 1) through press reports, etc. provide the media with unproof news reports that slandered against our universities and relevant persons, such as “E”, “G” in the F Press on the same day, “I” in the H Press on February 10, 2015, and “I” in the name of the Cratization Promotion Chairperson (the Intervenor). If the J President of the Korea Communications Commission does not withdraw his appointment in this society, he/she requests the Department C to conduct a comprehensive audit, and if there is no internal solution, he/she should also dispatch the Department C to the Director of the Korea Communications Agency.”

2. Four cases of filing a complaint with the president and teaching staff, such as occupational embezzlement (Type 11639), obstruction of duties and violation of the Higher Education Act (Type 3301), violation of the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection Act (Type 2009 and Form 25698), and a petition (Type 2010, Form 25985), which concluded a contract with the security service company by free contract and paid 500 million won or more, with the former president and teaching staff, and filed a complaint with the former president and affiliated office L, M, and N professor as a violation of the Higher Education Act, each complaint (Type 3301, Form 3301, Form 201), with the former Jeju District Prosecutors' Office without discrimination. However, there were no charges of rejection and suspension of indictment among them, and any remaining charges of non-discriminatory investigation with the outside investigative agency (Article 2015, No. 3301).

arrow