Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, with respect to Defendant B, the period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “C”), who actually operates C, and Defendant B is the relative of Defendant A’s friendly interest victim D.

As the financial situation of the C around March 2017 aggravated, the Defendants conspiredd to acquire money from the damaged party by iceing the sale of the EN bus vehicle owned by C.

According to the above public offering, Defendant B is the representative of C of March 2017, 201.

The company is a superior company that well-runs the company's public funds, and the employee has been 200 million won or more because of embezzlement of the company's public funds.

If it is conditioned that the vehicle will be purchased too much, and the vehicle will be purchased at a price of KRW 110 million per week, and the vehicle will be sold at a price of KRW 300,000 per month, and it will guarantee KRW 50,000 by selling at a price of KRW 300,000 after three years.

section 3.

However, Defendant A made a false statement to the effect that “I will pay 10 million won in lieu of 100 million won even if I purchase the building of Nam-gu F and G, Nam-gu, the Republic of Korea, which had been donated from his parents if I did not comply with the promise,” and Defendant A made a false statement to the effect that “I will pay 300,000 won in monthly proceeds from the purchase of the Enbb bus under the name of registration, and guarantee the value of the vehicle of 50,000 won or more by selling the vehicle for three years after the three years.”

However, the fact that C was difficult to find out the financial situation from January 2016. Accordingly, Defendant A provided 18 vehicles in the name of C as collateral and used a loan of KRW 300 million to cover 18 vehicles in the name of C without obtaining the consent of the borrower from February 2016. The fact was revealed.

shall continue to be urged by the borrower to repay the loan from such borrower.