logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2014.05.29 2014도3267
변호사법위반등
Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

Examining the evidence of the first instance court’s adoption, it is justifiable for the lower court to have found the Defendant guilty of the violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act (excluding the acquittal portion) among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds indicated in its

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there are no errors of misapprehending the rules of logic and experience to recognize facts.

Meanwhile, although the Defendant submitted a written appeal to the effect that he is dissatisfied with the entire judgment of the court below, the remaining guilty portion is not specified in the final appeal and the appellate brief.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow