beta
Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the subsequent order of payment shall be revoked.
The defendant.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except when adding or adding to, the following is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance.
2. The 3rd to 7th of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be added to or after the 4th of the judgment as follows.
Defendant asserts that the Defendant’s liability should be limited considering the mistake that the Plaintiff did not wear a safety cap while driving the Ortob, but it is difficult to readily conclude that the Plaintiff did not wear a safety cap at the time solely on the ground that the instant accident occurred on two parts. According to the evidence No. 11-2, it is only possible to recognize the fact that the Plaintiff’s actual survey report on the preparation of police officers entered the Plaintiff’s safety cap as an unknown safety cap, and there is no other evidence to support that the Plaintiff did not wear a safety cap, and the Defendant’s above assertion is without merit. The Defendant’s allegation is without merit.
The fourth three parallels in the first and third parallels in the judgment are as follows: “60 years of age” and “by July 31, 2014,” respectively, and “by September 3, 2012,” respectively.
The 16th 16th 10th 16th 16th 10th 20th 20th 20th 20.
In light of the above, the Plaintiff’s treatment received from the above medical clinic is mainly related to the prescription of the methods, such as the production, etc. of sugar drugs, and to the preservation of physical therapy including hot medicine, and the record book of nursing, it is difficult to find out that there was a need for long-term hospital treatment, not the pain treatment, in the above medical clinic. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff’s treatment concurrently takes account of the following factors: (a) from September 13, 2012 to the department of mental health in the G Hospital’s mental health, the hospitalization at the above medical clinic was caused by the instant accident and disability.