1. All claims filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant), the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Plaintiff), and the Defendants are dismissed.

2...

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship between the Parties 1) The Network R was 4 South and North 4 children between the wife, and the relationship between the Plaintiffs and the Defendant C, D, E, and F, centering on the network, are as follows: R (Death on October 12, 1994) S (C) 1 (M) 2 (F) T (M) A (M) A (M) F (M) A (M (M) F (M) A (M (M) A (M (M) A (M (M) 3 (M), FW 1963 (M), F (M) A (M) A (M (M) A (M (M) A (M (M) A (M (M) A (M (M) 3 (M (M) A (M (M) A (M (M) AD (M (M (M) AD (M (M) 4 (M) AD (M (M) AF (M (M) AF (M (M) AF (M) AF (M (M) AF (M) AF (M (M) AF (M (M) AF (M (M) 675 (M (M).

B. The real estate listed in the [Attachment 1] List Nos. 1 through 5, 9, and 12 is owned by the network R. The former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Real Estate (No. 4502, Nov. 30, 1992; hereinafter “Special Measures Act”).

In accordance with the annexed list “Defendant”, as stated in the Defendants’ name, each registration of ownership transfer was completed as stated in the “date of receipt and receipt of registration” and “the cause of registration” column of the same list in the same list and “the cause of registration.” (2) The real estate indicated in the annexed list Nos. 6, 7, and 8 was owned by the owner of the land cadastre, but the ownership transfer registration was completed as described in the “date of receipt and receipt of registration” and “the cause of registration” column of the same list in the name of Defendant D, respectively.

3) The real estate listed in the attached list No. 13 was owned by the original network, and on June 16, 1981, the registration of ownership transfer was completed under Defendant E’s name on the ground of the gift as of September 6, 1973 by the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Real Estate (Act No. 3094, Dec. 31, 1977). On the other hand, the registration of ownership transfer was completed as of the date of receipt and receipt of the registration in the attached list in Defendant E’s name and the “reasons for registration” column in the attached list in Defendant F’s name. Meanwhile, in relation to this case other than each real estate listed in the attached list, the change in ownership of the real estate owned by the network R was as follows:

The following table is less than the real estate of this case: