logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2019.01.23 2018나51888
손해배상금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) B, as the Plaintiff’s branch from February 8, 2011 to September 30, 2014, is in a multi-purpose rural water supply development project (Eiuri and 13 units, etc.) for the purpose of securing water resources and improving the agricultural environment, etc., with respect to those who actually cultivate crops in the land incorporated into a project site (hereinafter “compensation”) and are working for the Plaintiff’s branch from February 8, 201 to September 30, 2014.

2) B, by forging or falsely preparing documents related to compensation, had the person who is not entitled to receive the compensation receive it unlawfully, and had the person receive it receive it, and had the person receive it receive it.

3) Accordingly, B introduced the Defendant, who is not a person eligible for compensation, on the ground that “The landowners included in the D District project site receive less compensation and opposed to the incorporation. There are many difficulties in carrying out the project by asking for documents, such as a certificate of personal seal impression, a certified copy and abstract of resident registration, and a farmland ledger necessary for the payment of compensation. There is a false statement to the same effect that the payment of compensation would be made by the passbook. It would be possible to pay compensation to the landowners, and at the face of the week where the said compensation would be paid, and would be promoted well by paying additional compensation to the landowners.” (B) As such, the Defendant and B were not a person eligible for compensation.

(1) Although Defendant, B, and F was not entitled to receive the compensation, Defendant, B, and F were to receive the compensation from the Plaintiff and then to receive the compensation again.

2. On December 3, 2013, the Defendant did not have any fact in the Plaintiff’s C branch office in G located in the regional development department office, which is a business site, cultivating crops on the H 3,931 square meters prior to H and 192 square meters prior to I, and thus is not entitled to receive compensation. Nevertheless, the Defendant’s certificate of personal seal impression, resident registration, farmland ledger, copy of a bankbook, certificate of cultivation, certificate of cultivation, written request for compensation for farming losses, and written request for payment from account transfer

arrow