Defendant

A and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 2,000,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won.

The Defendants are the defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

C, Defendant A, Defendant B, and D received KRW 100,00 per day from E, a total book, and performed hosting by accessing a corrected gambling site according to the direction of the above E, or play a role in settling accounts after the game.

From August 25, 2016 to October 26, 2016 of the same year, the Defendants conspired with the above E to share the above role, carried out hosting approximately KRW 40 million per day on an average of KRW 60 million from KRW 40,000 per day to KRW 60,000,000,000 per day, and received dividends determined by the result of the corrected racing, etc., and displayed approximately KRW 720,000 to KRW 1,880,000 per day on August 18, 200.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with the above E in order to engage in gambling for profit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. The protocol of interrogation of suspects, the protocol of interrogation of suspects, the protocol of investigation of suspects, the protocol of investigation of suspects, the protocol of investigation of suspects, H, and I with respect to E, the protocol of investigation of suspects, the report of internal investigation (a statement of control prepared by a fair team member), the gathering of information related to enforcement, and the report of investigation (a statement of gambling period and amount of gambling);

1. References to inquiries, such as criminal history, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports (examination of the same kind of force by suspects);

1. Relevant Article 27(1)2 of the Bicycle and Motorboat Racing Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the Defendants in relation to criminal facts;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant C: Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: (a) examining the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; (b) the Defendants recognized the criminal facts of the instant case and reflect their mistakes; (c) the Defendants’ participation in the instant crime appears to have been committed on daily basis and according to E’s instructions; and (d) Defendant B did not have any history of criminal punishment.