logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.08.16 2018고단2161
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Acquittal of the accused shall be acquitted.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a business owner of the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building B and the 6th Maz.

No person shall arrange, solicit, induce or compel sexual traffic or sexual traffic in return for receiving or promising to receive money, valuables or other property benefits from unspecified persons.

Nevertheless, from October 18, 2017 to December 18:15, 2017, the Defendant received 100,000 won from many unspecified sexual buyers who found in the above place, and provided guidance to D (D, towing name: E) and F (F, towing name) of the nationality of the embling State of the embling State of sexual traffic at the place of business, and caused them to enter the body and sexual organs of sexual traffic and to enter into the sexual intercourse with the sex flag, thereby arranging the sexual traffic.

2. Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. provides that a person who has engaged in the conduct of arranging sexual traffic for business purposes shall be punished. In the event that an act of arranging sexual traffic, etc. in violation of the above provision is likely to repeat the same kind of act due to the nature of the constituent elements of the relevant crime, and where it is reasonable to evaluate the whole of such acts as one act because several repeated acts are conducted in a similar manner at a time and at a place close to a single and continuous criminal suspect, such acts shall be punished as an

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 92Do3405, Mar. 26, 1993; 2016Do19768, Feb. 15, 2017). Meanwhile, where a summary order has become final and conclusive with respect to a part of the crime in the relation of a single comprehensive crime, a judgment of acquittal shall be rendered for the previous crime on the basis of the time of issuing the summary order, and only for the following crimes shall be punished for a single crime.

(See Supreme Court Decision 94Do1318 delivered on August 9, 1994, etc.). The defendant is at the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court on April 27, 2018 as follows.

arrow