Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of each of the above penalties for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants came to know from around 2009 to around 2010 that they were working in the large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale medium-sized companies.

Defendant

A retired from office with the first police officer in 2012, A retired from office for the first time in 2013, and later Defendant C and B have retired from office for the same company.

However, when Defendant A received a request from Chinese restaurants that had been engaged in pre-sale transactions for requesting foreign cooks to invite business, Defendant A prepared an office in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government in order to conduct a business that solicits foreign cooks on behalf of business that solicits foreign cooks, Defendant C and B intended to use the office on the condition that Defendant C and B jointly bear the expenses incurred in maintaining the office and to invite foreign cooks.

1. Defendant A

A. On August 29, 2013, the Defendant of an official document forgery was requested by G operating a restaurant of F in Incheon at the above office to commission G to invite a Chinese national cook on his/her behalf.

In order to invite foreign cooks to employ the relevant restaurant, the relevant restaurant shall meet the requirements of at least three domestic employees who have been registered in the employment insurance subscriber list for at least 100 square meters, annual sales of at least 100 million square meters, and for at least three months. The above F failed to meet the requirements for the number of domestic employees.

Accordingly, the Defendant, among documents evidencing the number of employees employed by Chinese restaurants, posted and copied the list of H, I, B, and J that did not actually work in the column for the acquisition of insured status among documents describing the acquisition of insured status issued under the name of the director of the Ministry of Employment and Labor in mid-to medium local employment.

As such, the Defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged one copy of the record of the acquisition of insured status with employment insurance under the name of the head of the Central and Medium Local Labor Agency in the form of an official document, and also forged this business through March 11, 2015, 4, 5, 7, 8, 8, and 9.