beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for four years and for three years, respectively.
Two (Evidence Nos. 3), n.e., seized cottons.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
【Criminal Power】
1. Defendant A, at the Gwangju District Court on January 6, 201, sentenced three years to imprisonment for a crime of violating the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and the Protection of Victims, etc. on August 11, 201, and completed the execution of each of the above punishment in the Southern Prison on April 6, 2014. On November 7, 2002, in the same court, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment for a total of seven times, such as imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. (Larceny) and imprisonment for a total of four years for the same crime on July 20, 2006.
2. Defendant B was sentenced to five years of imprisonment due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. on November 8, 1990 by the Gwangju District Court on April 26, 2001 to one year and six months of imprisonment due to the same crime in the same court. On June 8, 2006, Defendant B was released on December 23, 2011 and the parole period expired on March 1, 2012 when the execution of the sentence was carried out in the Gwangju Prison.
【Criminal Facts】
In 208, the Defendants first known at the time of confinement in Gwangju prison, and after Defendant A released from the Southern prison on April 6, 2014, Defendant A contacted with E’s introduction. From May 6, 2014 to May 6, 2014, the Defendants sent card gambling along with a gambling room located in a party room located in the north-dong of Gwangju Mine-gu.
From June to July 2014, the Defendants lost a large amount of money with card gambling in the above gambling place. In particular, Defendant A received 10 million won from his family members as business funds.
Around August 2014, Defendant A proposed that Defendant B be punished by “a defect even if a thickness spawned,” and Defendant B asked Defendant B to be “a thickness.” After the lapse of one week, Defendant B asked Defendant A to be “a thickness.”
The Defendants, taking advantage of the fact that Defendant B is a taxi driver, Defendant B.