logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.08.13 2014고합189
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for three years, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on April 2, 1998, the Changwon District Court rendered a ruling to transfer the case to the Juvenile Department through special larceny, etc. on July 28, 1998, the same court received a ruling to transfer the case to the Juvenile Department through special larceny, etc. on May 18, 1999 and the disposition to transfer the juvenile protection case in the Changwon District Prosecutors' Office was taken on May 18, 199, respectively. On August 10, 200, the Busan High Court was sentenced to imprisonment for a short term of two years and three years for special larceny, etc. at the Busan High Court, and on October 15, 2009, the execution of the final sentence was terminated by the Gwangju District Court on October 3, 2013.

Defendant

B On July 10, 1997, the Gwangju District Court rendered a ruling to transfer the case to the Juvenile Department due to special larceny, etc. on June 24, 1998, the same court received a ruling to transfer the case to the Juvenile Department due to special larceny in the same court on March 13, 199, and the same court received a ruling to transfer the case to the Juvenile Department due to special larceny in the same court on March 13, 1999, respectively. On December 22, 2000, the Gwangju District Court sentenced 2 years of suspended sentence in October, 200, 1 year and 2 months of imprisonment due to larceny in the same court on March 28, 201, and 1 year and 6 months in the same court on June 13, 203 to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the imprisonment with prison labor in the Changwon District Court on July 13, 2005).

Defendants were aware of their prison life, and were living together in Gwangju.

On April 13, 2014, Defendant B went to the Diplomatic Conference, in the order of the crypian, in which Defendant B had been aware of it, and Defendant A parked the said car in the vicinity of the Victim G’s House located in F in the Y of the Y, the place of the said church, and in the order of the crypian.

arrow