1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 11, 2015, the Plaintiff is a public official who was appointed as a local construction inspector and served as a local facility assistant (construction class VII) from July 13, 2015 to July 13, 2015.

B. The Plaintiff was known to the Plaintiff that he had worked together in Gangnam-gu Office before the same division as the local facility C, which is the same division as the local facility owner (construction).

Upon the recommendation of C, the Plaintiff, along with C on May 29, 2016, had conducted a golf with the president, president, vice president, and one other. ② He/she from the Macheon G on June 24, 2016, and the president, vice president, and one other, and one golf from the above office at the first office on August 24, 2016. In this case, the Plaintiff borne the total of KRW 528,990 on behalf of the Plaintiff’s share of golf expenses on behalf of the said office.

C. On April 2016, the Plaintiff came to be close to K by the team leader of the J company. On July 30, 2016, at K’s recommendation, the Plaintiff carried out golf in voice L with K, C, and Seocho-gu’s M., and at this time, 272,50 won of the Plaintiff’s share was borne by K.

On July 1, 2016, the Plaintiff obtained approval on a business trip (from 09:50 to 13:50) and went to the office at around 12:00 and went to the golf, and left the place of work without permission. On July 6, 2016, the Plaintiff received the travel equipment even if he did not have a business trip after going to the business trip.

E. On October 16, 2016, the Plaintiff

(b)bed;

On November 15, 2016, the case was investigated by the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Audit Committee as the act as described in the paragraph was discovered and was investigated by the Office for Government Policy Coordination.

On February 15, 2017, the Mayor of Seoul Special Metropolitan City notified the defendant that the plaintiff would be subject to heavy disciplinary action according to the results of the above investigation.

F. The defendant and the plaintiff

(b)bed;

On March 22, 2017, the Local Public Officials Act and Seoul Special Metropolitan City Rules of Conduct for Public Officials were violated by engaging in the act as described in the paragraph, and the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Personnel Committee requested the plaintiff to make a resolution on disciplinary action against the plaintiff.

(g) Seoul Special Metropolitan City;