logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.02.06 2014고단2951
무고
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 16, 2013, the Defendant submitted a written complaint against C to the Gyeonggi Seocheon Police Station.

The contents of the written complaint are as follows: “C, despite the absence of the fact that it was delegated by the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the company of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the company of the office of the office of the company of the office of the office of the office of the company.”

However, in fact, the defendant has delegated C with the authority to make an application for an erroneous part under the name of the defendant, and in fact received the application from C with the capital company, so it was well aware that C's request was accepted by acceptance of a request from C for a change in the confirmable telephone, and it was accepted by C with the confirmation telephone from the capital company to accept it, and that the loan for an erroneous part was carried out under the name of the defendant, and thereafter, the defendant directly accepted the heavy part purchased by the capital company with an erroneous part.

Accordingly, the defendant was dismissed for the purpose of having C be subject to criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second court date);

1. Protocol concerning suspect interrogation of C;

1. Statement of the police statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow