The punishment of a defendant shall be ten months.

The execution of a sentence shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

『2017 고단 1571』 피고인은 2016. 12. 2. 장소를 알 수 없는 곳에서, 네이버 중고 나라 카페 게시판에 ‘ 유아도 서인 쫑알 이 자연 관찰 세이 펜 전집을 판매한다.

“The” posts the article, and delivers the article to C, “the price of KRW 248,00 is KRW 248,000,000,” which reported and contacted the article.

1. The term “assumed.”

C has deposited KRW 248,00 in the Defendant’s new bank account on the same day as he believed that the horses were.

However, the Defendant did not have any liability and did not have any intention or ability to send the liability even if he received money.

The Defendant, from that time to January 23, 2017, received KRW 248,00 by deceiving the victim C, and acquired the victims by deceiving the victims in the same manner six times, as shown in the List of Crimes, from that time until January 23, 2017.

"2017 Highest 1990"

1. On September 20, 2016, the injured party D posted a notice to sell a book “welst” on the same bulletin board at a certain place. D who reported and contacted the text will send the article to D with a text message “240,000 won upon deposit.”

“.....”

D beliefing that the horses were 21:57 on the same day, and around 21:57 on the same day, 2.40,000 won was paid to the account of the defendant's bank.

However, the Defendant did not have any liability and did not have any intention or ability to send the liability even if he received money.

The defendant, by deceiving the victim D, obtained 2,40,00 won.

2. On September 22, 2016, the victim E posted a notice to sell a book “welst” on the same bulletin board at a certain place. On September 22, 2016, the Defendant sent the notice to E who reported and contacted the text to E who deposits KRW 240,00 in the text message.

“.....”

E beliefing that the horses, around 14:05 on the same day, sent the book value of 2.40,000 won to the account of the defendant's bank.

However, the Defendant did not have any liability and did not have any intention or ability to send the liability even if he received money.

The defendants are the same.