1. The defendant's KRW 31,647,00 for the plaintiff and 6% per annum from January 1, 2020 to April 28, 2020 for the plaintiff.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff is an individual entrepreneur who runs the business of developing, manufacturing, selling, installing, trading, etc. ELSAY with the trade name of "D," and the defendant is a company that aims at the business of developing, distributing, installing, and managing PED ISDSAY, the defendant and the plaintiff on November 14, 2019, and the plaintiff made and supplied ELSA Symm (the actual contents, two places) to the defendant until November 30, 2019, and the defendant made and supplied 45,210,000 won (including value added tax; hereinafter the same shall apply) with the price of goods, and the defendant made and paid the contract deposit to the plaintiff by December 31, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as "the contract deposit of 30,1505, 2015).

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 31,647,00 won for goods (=45,210,000 won - 13,563,000 won) and damages for delay calculated by the rate of 12% per annum as stipulated in the Commercial Act from January 1, 2020 following the date of the payment of the price for goods to the defendant from January 1, 2020 to April 28, 2020 when the duplicate of the complaint of this case is served on the defendant.

2. The defendant's assertion was concluded with the introduction of F, which is the representative director of E, a stock company to which the plaintiff's spouse belongs, and since the defendant filed a complaint against F to commit fraud and occupational breach of trust and currently criminal litigation is underway, it cannot be complied with the plaintiff's claim for the payment of the goods. However, such reasons cannot be a ground for preventing the plaintiff from exercising the plaintiff's claim for the payment of the goods of this case. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. The plaintiff's claim is reasonable and acceptable.