1. The Defendants deliver to the Plaintiff the real estate indicated in the attached list.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

3.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a rental business operator under the former Rental Housing Act (amended by Act No. 11021, Aug. 4, 201; before enforcement on February 5, 2012; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the real estate listed in the attached list (hereinafter “instant real estate”) is a publicly constructed rental house under Article 2 subparagraph 2 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Rental Housing Act.

B. On August 9, 2006, the Plaintiff leased the instant real estate to Defendant A, and the lease agreement was renewed on September 29, 201, September 201, 201, September 25, 2013, and September 30, 2015, respectively.

At the time of a lease agreement with Defendant A, the Plaintiff agreed that “If the only lessee transfers the right of lease to another person or sub-leases the rental house to another person in violation of the former Rental Housing Act, the Plaintiff may cancel the lease agreement.”

C. On September 27, 2016, the Plaintiff’s employees conducted a fact-finding survey on the instant real estate. Defendant A and his/her spouse did not know the password of the entrance, and Defendant B opened the entrance.

The real estate of this case had no things of Defendant A, such as the clothes of Defendant A, and there were things of Defendant B and his ancillary, and Defendant A and their spouse did not respond properly to the question of the Plaintiff’s staff concerning the slaughter of the scam within the real estate of this case.

The spouse and children of the defendant A shall not have any resident registration on the real estate in this case.

E. On September 29, 2016, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant A of the termination of the said lease on the ground that the Defendant A did not reside in the instant real estate and had a third party reside without the Plaintiff’s consent, and that the said termination notice reached the Defendant A around that time.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap's evidence 1 or Gap's evidence 6 (including a branch number), the purport of whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, Defendant A raises this.