logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.10.25 2016고단2924
경범죄처벌법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 600,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On August 24, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence for the crime of interference with business at the Changwon District Court on August 24, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 1, 2016.

【Criminal Facts】

On August 5, 2016, at the office of the Kimhae Police Station C District Office located in Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si, and at around 23:15, the Defendant: (a) stated that he was under the influence of alcohol and the police officers “influence of a taxi”; (b) stated that he was able to return home while explaining the number of a taxi company and the place outside the cab where there are a large number of a taxi; and (c) stated that he was able to go home; (d) the Defendant stated that he was able to say that she would go home, she would go home, and (e) stated that she would go home, and (e) stated that she would go home through a very rough and disorderly act for 30 minutes in the state of drinking, such as “Sama, she must do so, and she will do so.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Statement on the actual state of exploitation;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of CCTV images taken by the accused to commit a crime);

1. Previous convictions: Application of criminal records, copies of written judgments and statutes;

1. Article 3 (3) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Minor Offenses and the Selection of Punishment of Minor Offenses and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Minor Offenses and Selection of Fine (the confession and reflection of the accused, and the crime of this case was committed prior to the pronouncement of the suspended sentence on the record of criminal records and the punishment that would have been received if the judgment

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow