Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On October 11, 2013, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender under suspicion of obstruction of the performance of official duties against patrol officers, who arrive at the scene after receiving a report on the front of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and on November 5, 2013, at the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors' Office, detained as a crime of obstruction of official duties, and was tried at the Seoul Southern District Court (the final judgment of KRW 5 million on December 19, 2013), and became subject to a trial (the final judgment of KRW 5 million) at the Seoul Southern District Court (the final judgment of KRW 5 million).

1. On November 14, 2013, at around 05:30 on November 14, 2013, the Defendant: (a) called the above C District on five occasions at the Guro-gu Seoul B District; and (b) caused a police officer in secret name to undergo a trial on November 29, 194; (c) may be able to do so; (d) I am fright at the time of internal death; (d) I am h son; (d) I am h son; and (d) I am h son at the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E District; and (d) I am h son and other police officers; and (d) I am h son and her body of the police officer, who was found to have been out of the C District and tried to kill the police officer during his service, and (d) I am h son and throw away his attitude to the police officer during his service.

2. When the Defendant was arrested on a flagrant offender under suspicion of obstruction of performance of official duties due to the above act, and was investigated at the Guro Police Station, around 07:31 on the same day, the Defendant threatened the above C District Police Station’s Criminal Party at the Guro Police Station’s Criminal Party Office located in Guro-gu, Seoul, Guro-gu, Seoul, by phone call to the said C District F, who is the guardF belonging to the C District.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers D and F on each situation.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.