logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.06.04 2018고단3217
출입국관리법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall invite a foreigner to enter the Republic of Korea by unjust means, such as a false statement of fact or a false fidelity guarantee, or arrange such invitation, or apply a false statement of visa or visa issuance, or arrange such application.

On March 2014, the Defendant (a disposition of suspending prosecution on November 27, 2015) introduced through C (a disposition of suspending indictment) (a disposition of November 27, 2015, the suspension of indictment was finalized by two years of suspended sentence of imprisonment in February 12, 2016) and offered a proposal that “The Defendant would operate a restaurant and employ the Myanmarer as an employee to reduce personnel expenses.” The Defendant, upon receiving a proposal that “The purpose of entry is to make it possible to falsely invite the Myanmar, for the purpose of “education”, a person who is employed.”

Accordingly, the Defendant, despite the fact that the purpose of entry into the Union of Myanmar was “employment” on August 2014, the Defendant: (a) drafted an application for visa issuance (C-3-1) stating false means to obtain technology for entry at the Embassy of Myanmar in the Republic of Korea on August 12, 2014 as follows: (b) from March 5, 2014 to January 6, 2015, the actual purpose of entry into the Republic of Korea was to obtain “employment” with respect to 29 Myanmar, including E, for total of 40 occasions, by inviting them to disguisedly engage in education, such as obtaining technology, for 40 times in total.

Accordingly, the Defendant invited foreigners to enter the Republic of Korea in collusion with the above C or D by unlawful means such as false statement of facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Copy of each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against D or C;

1. Each police statement made against E, G, H, I, J, K, L, or C;

1. Written statements;

1. A report on examination of general agreements on foreigners, D.

arrow