Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
From October 15:57 to 16:03 on October 6, 2017, the Defendant met the part of the victim D (the family name, leisure, 18 years old) of the victim E (the 18 years old) who passed through the road in the front of the C in Ansan-gu, Annyang-si, Annyang-si, Annyang-si, B from 15:57 to 16:03, and the her mother of the victim G (the 23 years old and the 46 years old and the 18 years old and the 18 years old and the her mother of the above 7 to 9 years old and the her mother of H (the 23 years old and the 46 years old and the 18 years old and the 10th old and the 20th old and the 10th old and the 20th old and the 20th old and the 1st old and the 20th old and the her mother.
Accordingly, the defendant forced victims to commit indecent acts.
Summary of Evidence
1. Each legal statement of witness D (alias), E, G, H, and I;
1. Each police statement made to E, I, D (alias), and G;
1. CCTV video CDs;
1. 112 reported case handling table;
1. An investigation report (victim D and H’s hearing of statements) was consistently and clearly stated that the victims were sexually committed by the Defendant from an investigative agency to this court, as stated in its reasoning, and that they were witnessed to commit indecent acts.
The above statements of the victims are not only consistent in their statements, the contents of the statements including before and after the statements are very concrete, and it is sufficiently reliable that it is difficult for the victims to find out special motives to gather the defendant at the risk of sexual humiliation and false statements.
This assertion that the body part of the victims who had contacted by the defendant does not seem to be a part that can be easily contacted with the victim due to block, tamp, and sound, etc., and the defendant could face because of walking in front of his hand due to visual disability. However, the victims of this case are not only women, but also women, and the descendants of the defendant are sensitive to the victims such as blick, tamp, etc.