The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who serves in the web design company.

On March 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on the ground that around 12:00 around 17, 2016, around 20 viewing hours in light of light view; and (b) on the ground that the Defendant committed an act to make the victim B (29 years of age, female ties, women’s ties, and harming women’s ties, the Defendant posted a photograph in which men and women are sexual intercourse under the title of “C”, and that the Defendant saw that the Defendant she was spicked within the lower end, “A spicked spack,” even though she was spick.

Finally, the bitch male male who had been fright until the last is fright of bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bit, and both years live in the mind of committing a crime in the body of man who has been frightch bitch bitch.

The B phone number D “A4 printed materials containing the content of “,” were produced and published on the wall of the first floor male toilet for the 1st floor of luminous viewing used by many and unspecified people, thereby impairing the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the same Act.

On April 20, 2016, after the prosecution of this case, the injured person withdrawn his wish to punish the defendant.

The public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.