beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 10,000,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from May 10, 2018 to September 4, 2019.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. According to the overall purport of each of the statements and arguments set forth in Nos. 1 through 13 (including paper numbers) of the Defendant’s tort, the Defendant is recognized to have committed each of the following illegal acts.
1) Around October 5, 2016, the Defendant entering a building (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s office”) with the second floor D of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, the office managed by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s office”).
(2) In order to load the Defendant’s goods, the Defendant opened a door in which the Defendant was able to load the Defendant’s goods, and entered the door without the Plaintiff’s consent. Accordingly, the Defendant was indicted for the crime of intrusion on a structure and sentenced to a fine of KRW 4,500,000 and the sentence became final and conclusive as is (the Changwon District Court Decision 2017No12,577 (merged) decided June 27, 2017; the Changwon District Court Decision 2017No1978 decided December 14, 2017; and the Supreme Court Decision 2017Do21944 Decided March 9, 2018). (2) In the event of an injury, the Defendant took part in CCTV as at the office before the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff took part in the Plaintiff’s knish belt and the Plaintiff’s knish belt as his hand, and the Plaintiff took part in the Plaintiff’s knish belt.
Accordingly, a summary order of KRW 500,000 was finalized as it is, the defendant was prosecuted for the crime of injury, and a fine of KRW 500,00.
(C) On May 10, 2018, the Defendant was aware that the Defendant was aware of the CCTV problem with the CCTV, and that the Plaintiff was aware of the Defendant’s body in order to satise the Plaintiff’s satis. The Plaintiff was aware of the Defendant’s satise, and that the Plaintiff did not satise the Defendant’s satise or satise the Defendant’s hand. However, on May 10, 2018, the Defendant used the computer at the office of a mutual Buddhist administrative agent located near the Changwon District Court’s Marsan Branch, 2018, and used the Defendant’s satise the Defendant’s satch.