1. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 1,449,285, Plaintiff B, and C, respectively, KRW 882,857, and each of the said money, respectively.

Basic Facts

A. On February 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) had a dispute between the deceased and the deceased as a matter of the distribution of the goods donated to him/her (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”); (b) caused the loss of the deceased, and (c) caused the death of the deceased to go beyond the upper part of his/her chests on the upper part of his/her upper part, thereby causing injury to the deceased for about three weeks in need of medical treatment; and (d) caused injury to the deceased.

(hereinafter the defendant's above act is referred to as "the injury of this case"). B.

The deceased died on March 30, 2017, and the deceased’s wife A, B, and C succeeded to the deceased.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, 6, 7 through 10 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the gist of the whole pleadings, and the gist of the plaintiffs' assertion

A. The Deceased died due to the instant injury.

Therefore, the Defendant is obliged to pay the deceased KRW 4,00,000 for medical expenses and KRW 10,000 for consolation money and KRW 10,000 for funeral expenses and KRW 5,00,000 for consolation money and KRW 5,000 for consolation money and KRW 2,50,000 for funeral expenses to the Plaintiff A, and KRW 2,50,000 for consolation money, respectively.

Therefore, the defendant is liable to pay 21,00,000 won [[6,00,000 won + (4,000,000 won + 10,000,000 won + 3/7] + 10,000,000 won + 5,00,000,000 won] to the plaintiff Eul and C, respectively, and to pay 6,50,000 won [4,00,000 won + 10,000 won + 10,000,000)] to the plaintiff who inherited the deceased and each delay damages thereof.

B. If there is no proximate causal relation between the deceased’s death and the act of injury of this case, the defendant is liable to pay medical expenses and consolation money to the plaintiffs who inherited the deceased as a result of the performance of the deceased’s liability for damages.

Judgment

1) We examine whether there is a proximate causal relation between the death of the deceased and the injury of this case. 2) The written evidence No. 5-3 and No. 1, and the fact-finding reply by the original synasium hospital, as follows.