logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.04.17 2014고단1498
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, around July 2013, 2013, posted an advertisement on the “intersection” where the victim C wishes to obtain a spouse, a non-party advertising site, with the intention of raising money to repay the money that he/she has borrowed for investment in real estate auction during the period of his/her cooperation with the victim from that time.

On October 15, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “The Defendant would make a lot of profit if he/she makes an investment in the auction of real estate. I make an investment to B when he/she has made an investment. I will make an investment. I will pay a lot of dividend.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim, the defendant was a plan to use the victim to pay his/her own debt instead of investing in the real estate auction.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 45 million won from the victim to the foreign exchange bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day from the victim, and received from that time until November 29 of the same year a total of 10 million won, including from November 29 of the same year, was transferred or delivered in cash the amount equivalent to 289.8 million won in total, as shown in the attached list of crimes.

"2014 Highest 1843"

1. On May 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D that “Sajin Police Station becomes aware of a large number of staff members of the Geinjin Police Station in China” in a coffee shop where it is impossible to know the trade name located in the Gungnam-si branch of the party branch of Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, the Defendant purchased gold bars and Damonds attached at an airport and gave a considerable profit to China via E. In the event of investing KRW 30 million in the airport, the Defendant would give a profit of KRW 2 million.”

However, the defendant does not coincide with E, and it is thought that the payment of the debt was made from the beginning, so even if he receives the investment money from the victim, he purchased and sells gold, etc.

arrow