logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2019.07.25 2019고단314
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

Seized evidence 3 or 4 shall be forfeited from the defendant.

evidence of seizure.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In order to induce victims by misrepresenting the public prosecutor, etc. of many unspecified victims, and the Defendant, according to the instructions of the above-mentioned persons, was willing to commit the crime of scaming in such a way that the victims receive cash from the victims and deliver them to the victims of their name in accordance with the instructions of the above-mentioned persons.

1. On November 7, 2018, at a place where it is not known at around 11:15, 2018, the victim B misrepresented the Seoul Central District Inspection, etc. by telephone to the effect that “the case in which the name of the party was stolen” was received. The money recorded in the party’s account was withdrawn in cash and delivered to the Financial Supervisory Service employee sent by us, to confirm and return it.” On the same day, the victim received cash KRW 10,010,000 and USD 10,000,000 from the street front of the Dialbook located in king-si at 15:30 on the same day. On November 8, 2018, the victim was unable to know at around 09:09, and returned to the Financial Supervisory Service the victim a false report by withdrawing KRW 10,000 from the bank account to the employee, with the phone.”

그러나 사실은 성명불상자는 검사가 아니고 위와 같은 방식으로 보이스피싱 범행을 하여 피해자로부터 돈을 가로챌 생각이었다.

As above, the person who was unaware of the name was accused of the victim and caused the victim to withdraw the money in the account of the National Bank in the name of the victim and move the money to D in the name of the victim, and the defendant under the direction of the person who was killed in the name was instructed by the victim at around 13:30 of the same day, and was issued KRW 10 million in cash from the victim, when he was aware that the victim was an employee of the Financial Supervisory Service.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim in collusion with the person who was not aware of his name.

2. An attempted fraud.

arrow