logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2019.02.20 2018고단2736
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2018 Highest 2736" means a public prosecutor, investigator, employee of the Financial Supervisory Service by misrepresenting the victims, and accepting the proposal of telephone financial fraud (tentatively referred to as "Sphishing"), which deceivings the victims to take part in the sphishing crime, by accepting the proposal of the name and unsphisher (B) which is the organizational basis of the organization (tentatively referred to as "C"), and the name unsphisher shall directly or by using personal information, etc. illegally collected to have the investigators, etc., misrepresent himself/herself, and shall undergo an investigation as he/she had been used in the course of committing the crime. When withdrawing and delivering all money from the current accounts to our employees, he/she shall take the role of deceiving the victims to the effect that "the victims will return after the investigation into the relevant case." The Defendant, by presenting the document under the name of the Financial Supervisory Service, misrepresenting the victims directly to the victims or his/her staff, and by delivering the cash withdrawn from the victims to another officer in order to deliver it to the other (tentative).

On April 16, 2018, at around 09:15, 2018, an employee of the Ssingishing, misrepresenting the investigator by putting a phone call to the victim D at an unclaimed place, and “illegal gambling site was arrested, and the party’s account was used. He/she must prove that there is no relationship with the crime. He/she should withdraw all the deposited deposits and deliver them to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service. The deposit was returned after the examination.”

The Defendant, at around 15:11 on the same day, assumes the victim, who had withdrawn cash from the account at the time of the aforementioned false statement, as an employee of the Financial Supervisory Service, and presents a document under the name of the Financial Supervisory Service issued by the victim by forging the false statement to the victim.

arrow